|
|
2004 Faculty Evaluation of Administrators
The
responses are an average from the following scale:
(5) Strongly Agree, (4) Agree, (3) Neutral, (2) Disagree, (1) Strongly Disagree
President Robert Brown:
Upholds
the principles of academic freedom and
tenure
3.4
Places
sufficient emphasis on academic salaries, relative to other
needs
3.2
Supports
the principles of shared
governance
3.0
Creates
a sense of
community
3.2
If
the decision were mine, I would rehire this administrator for another
year.
Yes 70%
Vice-President for Academic Affairs Jack Hamm
Upholds
the principles of academic freedom and
tenure
3.7
Seeks
to provide equitable workload/ salary
distribution
3.4
Supports
the principles of shared
governance
3.5
Encourages
and supports faculty development (sabbatical funding, for
example)
3.2
If
the decision were mine, I would rehire this administrator for another
year. YES 86%
Dean Cohoon
Upholds
the principles of academic freedom and
tenure
4.6
Involves
faculty in decisions concerning hiring and
retention
4.0
Refrains
from arbitrary punitive
actions
4.4
Compared
to other deans, overall performance is
excellent
4.4
Supports
the principles of shared
governance
4.0
If
the decision were mine, I would rehire this administrator for another
year
YES 92%
Dean Duncan
Upholds
the principles of academic freedom and
tenure
2.9
Involves
faculty in decisions concerning hiring and
retention
2.9
Refrains
from arbitrary punitive
actions
2.9
Compared
to other deans, overall performance is excellent
2.4
Supports
the principles of shared
governance
2.6
If
the decision were mine, I would rehire this administrator for another
year
YES 47%
Dean
Sheets
Upholds
the principles of academic freedom and
tenure
4.7
Involves
faculty in decisions concerning hiring and
retention
4.6
Refrains
from arbitrary punitive
actions
4.8
Compared
to other deans, overall performance is
excellent
4.4
Supports
the principles of shared
governance
4.4
If
the decision were mine, I would rehire this administrator for another
year
YES 90%
Dean Tyler
Upholds
the principles of academic freedom and
tenure
5.0
Involves
faculty in decisions concerning hiring and
retention
5.0
Refrains
from arbitrary punitive
actions
5.0
Compared
to other deans, overall performance is
excellent
4.5
Supports
the principles of shared
governance
5.0
If the decision were mine, I would rehire this administrator for another year YES 100%
Dean Watson
Upholds
the principles of academic freedom and
tenure
4.6
Involves
faculty in decisions concerning hiring and
retention
4.3
Refrains
from arbitrary punitive
actions
4.7
Compared
to other deans, overall performance is
excellent
4.6
Supports
the principles of shared
governance
4.6
If
the decision were mine, I would rehire this administrator for another
year
YES 100%
General Policy Statements
1.
Departmental peer review
committees should be elected by the departmental faculty
4.3
2.
Student evaluations carry too much weight in promotion and tenure
decisions.
3.4
3.
Administrators on faculty standing committees should be non-voting
members.
3.8
4.
Administrative appointees on the faculty senate should be non-voting
members.
3.7
5.
Departmental peer review committees should consider service and
research.
3.6
6.
All tenured faculty within a department should have a voice in
tenure/promotion
decisions. (full professors consider promotion to full professor, etc.) 3.5
7.
Free speech should be restricted to the outskirts of the campus.
(see for example the student handbook on free speech on
campus)
1.6